Katzenberger

People v. Katzenberger

Good Law
101 Cal. Rptr. 3d 122·178 Cal. App. 4th 1260·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 1751·9 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 13
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 2, 2009C058883California3,409 words

Opinion

Opinion

Cantil-Sakauye, J.

Defendant Herbert Aaron Katzenberger was convicted by a jury of inflicting corporal injury on the mother of his child in violation of Penal Code section 273.5, subdivision (a). He separately admitted serving a prior prison term within the meaning of section 667.5, subdivision (b). The trial court sentenced him to state prison for a total of four years, comprised of the middle term of three years for his section 273.5 conviction and one year for the prior prison term enhancement.

His sole claim on appeal relates to a PowerPoint presentation used by the prosecutor in her closing argument to illustrate the reasonable doubt standard. The PowerPoint presentation consisted of eight puzzle pieces forming a picture of the Statue of Liberty. The first six pieces came onto the screen sequentially, leaving two additional pieces missing. The prosecutor argued it was possible to know what was depicted “beyond a reasonable doubt” even without the missing pieces. The prosecutor then added the two missing pieces to show the picture was in fact the Statue of Liberty. The trial court overruled defendant’s objection to the presentation. Defendant now claims reversal is required because the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.