Board of Retirement v. Superior Court

Good Law
101 Cal. App. 4th 1062·124 Cal. Rptr. 2d 850·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 4606·2002 Daily Journal DAR 10264·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8185
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 5, 2002B158075California3,343 words

Opinion

Opinion

Yegan, J.

A retired county employee receiving a disability allowance commits a crime and is ordered to make restitution to the victim. The county retirement system is maintained under the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937 (CERL). (Gov. Code, § 31450 et seq.) If the retired employee fails to make restitution, can the trial court order the county retirement system to deduct restitution payments from the employee’s disability allowance? The answer is no. Although the victim has a constitutional and statutory right to restitution, the trust funds held for the employee are afforded constitutional and statutory protections as well. These protections have not been repealed by implication. As we shall explain, they can be harmonized with the victim’s right to restitution. Accordingly, we issue a writ of mandate directing the trial court to set aside its order requiring the Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association (LACERA) to deduct restitution payments from the disability allowance of real party in interest Teresia O’Riley.

Facts and Procedural History

O’Riley is a retired member of LACERA, which pays her a monthly disability allowance of $1,950. She was convicted of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.