Kahn

Kahn v. Chetcuti

Good Law
101 Cal. App. 4th 61·123 Cal. Rptr. 2d 606·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 4497·2002 Daily Journal DAR 9225·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7370
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 12, 2002A096670California2,174 words

Opinion

Opinion

Jones, J.

In this dispute arising from the sale of a home to respondents, seller Benny Chetcuti, Jr., appeals from a judgment confirming an award in a contractual arbitration and denying his petition to correct the award. He contends (1) the arbitrator exceeded his powers, and (2) the arbitrator erred procedurally when he awarded attorney fees and costs to respondents. In the published portion of the opinion, we interpret the parties’ agreement to authorize the arbitrator to determine whether the prevailing party’s act of filing a complaint before an obligatory mediation barred the award of attorney fees to that party. That determination, we conclude, is not subject to judicial review. We reject the second argument in the unpublished portion of our opinion and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

In March 1995, appellant purchased a residence located on Edgehill Drive in Burlingame as a business investment. Appellant renovated the property and then listed it for sale. Respondents Philip and Mara Kahn purchased the residence from appellant in June 1996 for $455,000. The purchase agreement contained clauses stating that any disputes arising out of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.