Dictor

Dictor v. David & Simon, Inc.

Good Law
106 Cal. App. 4th 238·130 Cal. Rptr. 2d 588·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 224·2003 Daily Journal DAR 1757·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1399
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 2003B159531California6,853 words

Opinion

Opinion

Turner, J.

I. Introduction

Plaintiff, Johanne Dictor doing business as CPCI, the assignee of Manhattan Transportation Company, Inc. (Manhattan), appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of defendants, Julian Gonzalez doing business as Gonzalez Trucking, and David & Simon, Inc., doing business as GTW (GTW). Plaintiff sought damages for computer equipment that was lost while being shipped in interstate commerce. Based upon a bill of lading which was prepared and signed by an employee of plaintiff’s assignor, Manhattan, the trial court held the total amount plaintiff could recover was $7,106. Because the trial court correctly found this case is controlled by the Carmack Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act and the $7,106 computation in the bill of lading must be enforced, we affirm the judgment.

II. Background

A. The Pleadings

The first amended complaint, which is the operative pleading, alleged that Manhattan hired defendant, GTW, to transport by truck computer equipment from Carson, California to Las Vegas, Nevada. The computer equipment had a market value of no less than $267,488. Thereafter, GTW hired Mr. Gonzalez and Bolanos Trucking to deliver the computer…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.