Howard S. Wright Construction Co. v. Superior Court

Good Law
106 Cal. App. 4th 314·130 Cal. Rptr. 2d 641
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 17, 2003A099318California4,483 words

Opinion

Opinion

Jones, J.

This writ proceeding arises from a lawsuit brought by petitioner Howard S. Wright Construction Co. (HWCC) to foreclose its mechanic’s lien in the amount of $2.4 million on property owned by real party in interest, BBIC Investors, LLC (BBIC). BBIC had leased the property to 360networks, and the construction work performed by petitioner consisted of improvements to convert the property from a warehouse into an adequate facility for 360network’s telecommunications business. The question posed to us is whether the notice of nonresponsibility recorded and posted by BBIC insulates the property from the lien for construction work undertaken by 360networks, the now bankrupt tenant.

Procedural History

Soon after petitioner filed its complaint, it also recorded a notice of lis pendens. BBIC then moved to expunge the notice of lis pendens on the grounds that BBIC had no privity with petitioner, that the construction work was performed pursuant to a contract between petitioner and 360networks, and that BBIC had previously recorded a notice of nonresponsibility. Simultaneously, BBIC moved to “remove” the mechanic’s lien on the same grounds.

In opposition to those motions,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.