Ceja

People v. Ceja

Good Law
106 Cal. App. 4th 1071·131 Cal. Rptr. 2d 601·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 339·2003 Daily Journal DAR 2712·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2087
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 7, 2003B157257California6,101 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hastings, J.

Introduction

Appellant, Bismark Ceja, was charged with numerous crimes involving a number of different victims occurring at different times and locations. He pled not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity (NGI). In the guilt portion of his trial he was convicted by a jury of all charges. His convictions include the following crimes: kidnapping to commit another crime (Pen. Code, § 209, subd. (b)(1)); forcible oral copulation (§ 288a, subd. (c)(2)); sodomy by use of force (§ 286, subd. (c)(2)); forcible rape (§261, subd. (a)(2)); sexual penetration with a foreign object (§ 289, subd. (a)(1)); carjacking (§ 215, subd. (a)); and second degree robbery (§ 211). The jury also found numerous enhancement allegations to be true. Some related to appellant’s use of deadly weapons in connection with the crimes and some related to the kidnapping charges.

A new jury was later empanelled for the NGI portion of the trial. After the evidence had been presented, the trial court granted a motion in favor of the People, pursuant to section 1118.1, dismissing the special plea of NGI. The jury was then dismissed. Appellant was sentenced to 150 years to life plus four consecutive life…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.