Moreno

Moreno v. Greenwood Auto Center

Good Law
110 Cal. Rptr. 2d 177·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 607·2001 Daily Journal DAR 7968·91 Cal. App. 4th 201·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6502
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 1, 2001B138608California3,831 words

Opinion

Opinion

Turner, J.

I. Introduction

Defendant, Greenwood Auto Center, appeals from portions of a judgment awarding damages and attorney fees to plaintiff, Carmen Moreno, in an action brought for fraud, conversion, and violation of the Vehicle Leasing Act (the act). (Civ. Code, § 2985.7 et seq.) In the published portion of the opinion, we discuss whether prejudgment interest may be recovered in a conversion action where defendant was assessed damages for plaintiff’s loss of use of her 1996 pickup truck and other financial losses. No damages were imposed for the value of the 1996 pickup truck at the time of the conversion. Given the express language in section 3287, subdivision (a), we conclude prejudgment interest can be recovered on the loss of use and other damages suffered by plaintiff.

II. Background

The complaint was originally filed in former municipal court on June 5, 1997. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on July 30, 1997. On April 28, 1999, on plaintiff’s motion, the matter was transferred to the superior court for trial. In the first amended complaint, plaintiff sought: damages and attorney fees for alleged violation of the act (first cause of action); rescission of contract…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.