Youngblood

People v. Youngblood

Good Law
109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 776·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 599·2001 Daily Journal DAR 7899·91 Cal. App. 4th 66·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6472
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 30, 2001C033929California2,822 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nicholson, J.

The defendant accumulated 92 cats and kept them in a 7%-foot by 11-foot trailer, providing less than one square foot for each cat. Convicted by jury of felony animal cruelty and placed on probation, she appeals. She asserts the trial was tainted by instructional error, due process violations, and evidence that should have been suppressed. We affirm.

Procedure

The defendant was charged by information with seven counts of animal cruelty in violation of Penal Code section 597, subdivision (b). Count 1 alleged cruelty to all 92 of the cats, while counts two through seven alleged cruelty to one specified cat each. The jury found the defendant guilty of count 1 but not guilty of counts two through seven. The court placed the defendant on five years of formal probation with a condition that she serve 92 days in county jail. The court also ordered her not to possess or care for any cat or dog, except for a cat named Holly Angel.

Facts

On December 31, 1998, Officer Robert Carter of Placer County Animal Control responded to a complaint that an excessive number of cats were being kept under poor health and living conditions in a small trailer. Officer Carter went to the property…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.