McIntyre

McIntyre v. Santa Barbara County Employees' Retirement System

Good Law
110 Cal. Rptr. 2d 565·91 Cal. App. 4th 730
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 14, 2001B144038California1,930 words

Opinion

Opinion

Yegan, J.

Larry McIntyre appeals from the judgment denying his petition for a writ of mandate (Code Civ. Proc. § 1085) compelling respondent Santa Barbara County Employees’ Retirement System, Board of Retirement (Board) to follow certain procedures in deciding his application for a service-connected disability retirement. He contends the Board’s procedures result in a breach of its fiduciary duties, violate due process, and violate the 1937 County Employees Retirement Law (CERL). (Gov. Code, § 31450 et seq.) The trial court found each claim to be without merit as a matter of law. We affirm.

Facts

Appellant developed mycoplasmic pneumonia in 1989. The disease left him susceptible to blood clots and, as a result, he is required to take a blood-thinning medication called Coumadin. Appellant’s employer, the Summerland-Carpinteria Fire District, determined that he could no longer perform his job duties as a fire fighter because the medication increases the risk he will suffer a serious injury. Appellant last worked for the fire district in September 1997.

In May 1998, he applied to the Board for a service-connected disability retirement. The Board obtained copies of appellant’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.