Garza

People v. Garza

Good Law
107 Cal. App. 4th 1081·132 Cal. Rptr. 2d 831·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 538·2003 Daily Journal DAR 4027·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3175
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 14, 2003C039029California5,222 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sims, J.

In a case arising out of defendant Julio Romero Garza’s sexual assault on Cynthia R. on August 23, 2000, a jury convicted defendant on 18 felony counts: kidnapping for rape (count 1; Pen. Code, § 209, subd. (b)(1); all further undesignated section references are to the Penal Code), forcible oral copulation (counts 2-6; § 288a, subd. (c)(2)), forcible rape (counts 7-14; § 261, subd. (a)(2)), forcible digital penetration (count 15; § 289, subd. (a)(1)), sexual battery (count 16; § 243.4, subd. (a)), false imprisonment (count 17; § 236), and assault with a firearm (count 18; § 245, subd. (a)(2)). The jury also found that defendant personally used a firearm as to all counts. (§ 12022.53.) Finally, the jury found as to counts 2 through 15 that defendant kidnapped the victim for the purpose of committing rape, forcible oral copulation, or digital penetration, and substantially increased the risk of harm to the victim over and above that necessarily present in the underlying crime. (Cf. § 667.61, subds. (a), (d).)

The trial court sentenced defendant as follows: on count 2 (forcible oral copulation), the court imposed an indeterminate life sentence with a minimum of 25 years…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.