Thuss

People v. Thuss

Good Law
107 Cal. App. 4th 221·133 Cal. Rptr. 2d 149·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 434·2003 Daily Journal DAR 3232·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2585
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 21, 2003C040272California4,776 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sims, J.

Following the denial of his motion to traverse a search warrant and suppress evidence, defendant Joshua James Thuss pled no contest to possession of marijuana for sale in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11359. On appeal, defendant contends: (1) he was denied due process when the trial court refused to admit certain evidence relevant to the affiant’s credibility at the traversal hearing (Franks v. Delaware (1978) 438 U.S. 154 [ 98 S.Ct. 2674 , 57 L.Ed.2d 667 ] (Franks)) and (2) there was insufficient probable cause to support the search warrant for his residence.

We shall conclude that defendant may not complain that certain writings were not admitted in evidence where he did not move the writings into evidence. We shall further conclude that the presence of fresh marijuana clippings in defendant’s trash outside his house furnished probable cause to obtain a warrant to search the house. We shall therefore affirm the judgment.

Background

On the morning of November 4, 1999, Placer County Sheriffs served a search warrant at defendant’s residence located at 4879 Willowbrook Drive in Sacramento. There, officers found 47 marijuana plants, in various stages of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.