Shamsian

Shamsian v. Atlantic Richfield Co.

Good Law
107 Cal. App. 4th 967·132 Cal. Rptr. 2d 635·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 515·2003 Daily Journal DAR 3943·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3103
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 10, 2003B157698California5,728 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ashmann-Gerst, J.

This appeal arises out of soil and groundwater contamination caused by gasoline leakage from an underground storage tank at a service station formerly operated by respondent Morris Shachory (Shachory), a sublessee of respondent Atlantic Richfield Company (ARGO). The appellants Parviz David Shamsian (Shamsian) and Roya Goltche (Goltche), the current possessors of the property, seek to hold Shachory and ARGO (collectively respondents) liable for statutory penalties, damages, future remediation, and injunctive relief. The trial court granted summary judgment for the respondents, which the appellants now challenge.

We hold that the appellants’ cause of action for civil penalties brought under Health and Safety Code section 25249.7, the civil enforcement provision in the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (the Act), is barred by the one-year limitation in Code of Civil Procedure section 340, subdivision (a). Further, we conclude that there are triable issues as to whether the appellants’ nuisance and trespass causes of action are barred by the three-year limitation set forth in section 338, subdivision (b), and as to whether the appellants are entitled to a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.