Zapanta

Zapanta v. Universal Care, Inc.

Good Law
107 Cal. App. 4th 1167·132 Cal. Rptr. 2d 842·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 565·2003 Daily Journal DAR 4071·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3226
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 16, 2003B159465California2,838 words

Opinion

Opinion

Todd, J.

In this case, we address the question of whether the trial court erred in granting a defense motion for summary judgment where the plaintiffs filed a request for dismissal without prejudice one day before their opposition to the motion was due. Plaintiffs and appellants Christy Zapanta, by and through her guardian ad litem, Mary Jean Maloles, and Mary Jean Maloles, individually, maintain that they were entitled to voluntarily dismiss their action before commencement of trial under Code of Civil Procedure section 581, subdivision (b)(1). The trial court disagreed and granted summary judgment in favor of defendants and respondents Universal Care, Inc., and Eddie Quan, M.D. We reverse.

Background

Appellants commenced this medical malpractice action against respondents on May 24, 2001. Appellants claimed that respondents’ delay in diagnosing a pseudomonas bacterial infection resulted in the severe neurological impairment of Zapanta. Zapanta’s mother claimed negligent infliction of emotional distress as a bystander witness.

On March 7, 2002, respondents filed a motion for summary judgment, which included the declaration of an expert witness, Andrew P. Novom, M.D., who…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.