Kim

Harbor Island Holdings, L.L.C. v. Kim

Good Law
107 Cal. App. 4th 790·132 Cal. Rptr. 2d 406·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 488·2003 Daily Journal DAR 3727·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2902
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 2, 2003G030264California2,973 words

Opinion

Opinion

Moore, J.

A landlord, displeased with its tenant, reluctantly agreed to a lease extension requiring greatly increased rental payments. The landlord demanded one price if the tenant complied with the lease agreement in every regard and double that amount in the event of any breach. After the conclusion of the extended lease term, the landlord sued the tenant, seeking both damages occasioned by the tenant’s failure to properly maintain the premises, plus nearly a quarter of a million dollars for the doubled rent. The trial court awarded damages for the failure to maintain the property, but held the lease provision for the doubled rent was unenforceable as a penalty. The landlord appeals. We agree with the trial court’s reasoning and affirm.

I

Facts

Harbor Island Holdings, L.L.C. (Harbor Island) leased certain commercial property, located in Torrance, California, to E & J Textile Group, Inc. (E & J) and James Y. Kim (Kim). The original lease term was from July 1, 1996, through June 30, 1999. E & J and Kim had contemplated moving to new premises at the end of the original lease term. However, the construction of the new premises was not completed on time, so they sought a lease…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.