In Re Luke M.

Good Law
107 Cal. App. 4th 1412·132 Cal. Rptr. 2d 907
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 23, 2003D040863California5,637 words

Opinion

Opinion

Julie E. Braden, San Diego, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Minors.

Certified For Partial Publication. [1]

HALLER, Acting P.J.

Jeffrey L. (Jeffrey or father) appeals orders under the Welfare and Institutions Code [2] placing his children, Luke M. and Lenay M., with their paternal aunt and uncle, rather than with him, pending reunification with the children's mother, Kathy M. (Kathy or mother). He contends (1) the court improperly considered the statutes relating to sibling relationships when making its decision; (2) the court's ruling violated his substantive due process rights by placing sibling rights over parental rights; (3) substantial evidence did not support the finding under section 361.2 that the children would suffer detriment if placed with him; (4) the court abused its discretion by requiring Interstate Compact on Placement of Children (ICPC) approval before placing the children with him; and (5) the court did not order appropriate reunification services for him. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, we reject his arguments except as to the issue of reunification services. The parties agree Jeffrey is entitled to appropriate reunification…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.