Quintana

Quintana v. GUIJOSA

Good Law
107 Cal. App. 4th 1077·132 Cal. Rptr. 2d 538·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 537·2003 Daily Journal DAR 4025·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3174
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 13, 2003B158202California757 words

Opinion

Opinion

Armstrong, J.

On January 15, 2002, appellant Dulce Marie Quintana applied for a restraining order and temporary restraining order against her husband, Raul Guijosa, under the Domestic Violence Prevention Act. (Fam. Code, § 6200 et seq.) With her applications, appellant declared that Guijosa was violent and that she feared him. She specified that in November of 2001, he tried to force her into sex and tried to cut her face with a piece of glass “so that no one would want her.” When she attempted to get away, he cut her wrist and palm. On December 30, 2001, he damaged the prosthesis in her right eye by hitting it, and on December 31, 2001, from midnight until 2:00 in the morning, he kicked the front door of the home where she was staying and yelled obscenities. He constantly called her, and stalked her. She was afraid that he would hurt her, and as a result had stopped going to her English classes.

The trial court denied the request for a temporary restraining order, and when the matter was called for a hearing on February 7, denied the application without a hearing. The court stated its reasons with reference to a single sentence in the declaration: “our children are in Mexico.”

The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.