Portillo

People v. Portillo

Good Law
107 Cal. App. 4th 834·132 Cal. Rptr. 2d 435·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 495·2003 Daily Journal DAR 3823·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2930
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 4, 2003D038761California4,605 words

Opinion

Opinion

Huffman, J.

A jury convicted Coby J. Portillo of first degree murder (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a)), forcible rape (§261, subd. (a)(2)), and forcible sodomy (§ 286, subd. (c)(2)). The jury also found true allegations that Portillo had used a deadly weapon, a hammer, in committing the murder (§ 12022, subd. (b)(1)), and that he had committed the murder during the commission or attempted commission of rape and sodomy, both special circumstances (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(17)). The trial court sentenced Portillo to life in prison without the possibility of parole, plus a consecutive one year for the deadly weapon use enhancement.

Portillo appeals, contending the trial court prejudicially erred in expanding the scope of felony-murder sex offenses to include a homicide that occurred after the sex offenses were complete, but before the defendant reached a place of temporary safety. Alternatively, Portillo asserts that if felony-murder rape and sodomy include the “escape rule,” then the felony-murder special circumstances regarding rape and sodomy must be set aside as constitutionally defective because they merely duplicate the crime of felony murder for those underlying offenses. In addition,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.