Dobbins

People v. Dobbins

Bad Law
127 Cal. App. 4th 176·2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 299·2005 Daily Journal DAR 2345·24 Cal. Rptr. 3d 882·2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1714
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 2005C046381California2,548 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sims, J.

On July 3, 2003, defendant Clarence Ray Dobbins pled no contest to possession of a controlled substance. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11350, subd. (a).) Pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement, the trial court sentenced him to the 16-month lower term but suspended execution of the sentence and granted probation pursuant to Proposition 36. (See Pen. Code, § 1210.1; undesignated section references are to the Penal Code.) Defendant violated probation by committing new offenses. At a hearing on March 15, 2004, the trial court ordered him to serve the 16-month prison sentence.

On appeal, defendant claims the trial court erred by failing to order and consider an updated or supplemental probation report before declining any further grant of probation. We conclude that the court erred but find the error to be harmless considering the peculiar facts of this case. Accordingly, we shall affirm the judgment.

BACKGROUND

The initial probation report was signed by the probation officer and dated July 17, 2003, shortly before the first sentencing hearing. It reflects that defendant’s adult record includes at least six felonies and four misdemeanors. He had been sentenced to state prison on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.