Park

Park v. Deftones

Good Law
1999 Cal. App. LEXIS 463·71 Cal. App. 4th 1465·84 Cal. Rptr. 2d 616·99 Daily Journal DAR 4407·1999 WL 294737
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 11, 1999B124598California2,142 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nott, J.

Dave Park appeals from the summary judgment entered against him in his action for breach of contract and intentional interference with contractual relations. His action arises from the termination of his personal manager contract by the Deftones, a music act whose members are Camillo Wong Moreno, Stephen Carpenter, Abe Cunningham, and Chi Ling Cheng (referred to collectively as the Deftones), without paying him commissions which he asserts are due him. In addition, Park alleges that after he secured a recording contract for the Deftones with Maverick Records (Maverick), the record company and one of its agents, Guy Oseary, purposefully interfered with Park’s contractual relationship with the Deftones. The trial court granted summary judgment on the ground that the management contract between the Deftones and Park was void, Park having violated the Talent Agencies Act (the Act) by securing performance engagements for the Deftones without being licensed as a talent agency. (Lab. Code, § 1700 et seq.) We affirm on that ground.

Procedural and Factual Background

Park filed this action in October 1996, alleging breach of certain management agreements against the Deftones and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.