Fond

People v. Fond

Good Law
1999 Cal. App. LEXIS 308·71 Cal. App. 4th 127·83 Cal. Rptr. 2d 660·99 Daily Journal DAR 3267·99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2523
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 5, 1999B118719California2,007 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

Here we hold, among other things, that a hospital room in a locked psychiatric hospital is an inhabited dwelling for the purpose of first degree burglary.

Philip Fond was convicted after a jury trial on one count of misdemeanor indecent exposure (Pen. Code, § 314, subd. I); one count of forcible rape (§ 261, subd. (a)(2)); and one count of residential burglary (§ 459). The jury also found true that Fond committed the rape during the commission of a first degree burglary (§ 667.61).

The trial court sentenced Fond to 15 years to life for rape. The court found the 25-year-to-life sentence mandated by section 667.61 to be cruel and unusual punishment under the circumstances here. The court sentenced Fond to a concurrent 180 days for indecent exposure and stayed a 4-year sentence on the burglary count pursuant to section 654.

On appeal Fond contends that a locked psychiatric hospital is not an inhabited dwelling house for the purpose of first degree burglary; that the trial court improperly denied Fond’s motion for a new trial on the burglary count; and that there is insufficient evidence of forcible rape.

The Attorney General contends that the 25-year-to-life sentence…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.