In Re Brandon C.

Good Law
71 Cal. App. 4th 1530·84 Cal. Rptr. 2d 505
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 30, 1999B124552California2,754 words

Opinion

Opinion

EPSTEIN, Acting P.J.

In this appeal, the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) challenges the juvenile court order selecting guardianship as the permanent plan for Brandon and Rangey C. We find substantial evidence to support the order and affirm.

Brandon and Rangey C, twin boys born June 14, 1994, were detained in October 1994 after DCFS learned that they had been victims of domestic violence. They were placed in the home of their paternal grandmother, Mary S., in December 1994, and have been in her care since that time. The boys were declared dependent children pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 300 [1] in February 1995, based on sustained allegations that Rangey had suffered injuries while in his parents' care, and that their mother had a history of substance abuse.

Reunification services were ordered and provided, but as of May 28, 1996, the date of the section 366.22 hearing, neither parent had completed the court-ordered treatment. The court found reasonable reunification services had been offered, but that returning the boys to their parents' care would create a substantial risk of detriment to them. Reunification services were terminated and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.