Mangaoang v. Boyd. Sasieff v. Boyd

Good Law
186 F.2d 191·1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2316
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 27, 195012757, 12758California3,234 words

Opinion

Opinion

Stephens, J.

The two appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington which are treated in this opinion were orally argued to us at the same session of court in which, four similar appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California were argued to us. We decided the California cases on the 16th day of December, 1950, and on that date filed our opinion in one of them, namely Carlson v. Landon, 9 Cir., 186 F.2d 183 . The facts, the issues, the applicable law, and our reasoning as to applicable principles recited in that opinion apply largely to the instant or Washington cases. The two .groups of proceedings were treated somewhat differently by the two trial courts which heard them, requiring different treatment by us. We here make general reference to the Carlson opinion and as we proceed will quote therefrom.

Mangaoang

Petitioner Mangaoang has been a resident of the United States since 1926; was arrested on a warrant dated June 28, 1949, issued by John P. Boyd, District Director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, upon authority of the Attorney General of the United States, on August 1, 1949, charging him under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.