Page

Page v. Superior Court

Caution
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 57·31 Cal. App. 4th 1206·37 Cal. Rptr. 2d 529·95 Daily Journal DAR 1228·66 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1798
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 1995C018589California4,283 words

Opinion

Opinion

Puglia, J.

Petitioner (plaintiff) seeks a writ of mandate directing the respondent superior court to vacate its order sustaining without leave to amend the demurrer of real party in interest Dennis Montgomery (Montgomery) to the first cause of action of plaintiffs second amended complaint, and to enter an order overruling the demurrer. At issue is whether a supervisor can be held personally liable for sexual harassment of and retaliation against an employee in violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA; Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.; further statutory references to sections of an undesignated code are to the Government Code.). We shall conclude a supervisor is a “person” subject to liability under FEHA.

I

The facts are taken from the material allegations of fact in plaintiff’s second amended complaint. In reviewing the sufficiency of a complaint against a demurrer, all material facts are deemed admitted. If the material facts show the plaintiff is entitled to any relief, the complaint will be held sufficient. (See, e.g., Scott v. City of Indian Wells (1972) 6 Cal.3d 541, 549 [ 99 Cal.Rptr. 745 , 492 P.2d 1137 ].)

Real party in interest 3NET Systems, Inc.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.