Cutler-Orosi Unified School District v. Tulare County School Districts Liability/Property Self-Insurance-Authority

Good Law
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 1322·31 Cal. App. 4th 617·37 Cal. Rptr. 2d 106·95 Daily Journal DAR 647·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 395
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 14, 1994F019412California5,540 words

Opinion

Opinion

Dibiaso, J.

We are required by this case to decide whether public school districts sued in actions seeking declaratory and injunctive relief under the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965 ( 42 U.S.C. § 1973 et seq.) are entitled to a defense provided by their insurance carrier pursuant to liability policies covering “all sums which the Insured shall become obligated to pay as damages ... by reason of the liability imposed by law” (italics added). In particular, the issues before us include whether the costs of complying with a mandatory injunction or the costs of reimbursing the voting rights plaintiffs for their attorney fees constitute “damages” within the scope of the policies. We will conclude that they are not, and for this and other reasons hold that the insurer had no duty to defend the districts.

Factual and Procedural History

Plaintiffs are three school districts located in Tulare County — the CutlerOrosi Unified School District, the Dinuba Joint Union High School District, and the Dinuba Elementary School District (the Districts) — and their respective boards of education. In 1991, certain residents of the Districts brought separate actions in federal district court alleging…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.