McMILLIN-BCED/MIRAMAR

McMillin-BCED/Miramar Ranch North v. County of San Diego

Good Law
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 26·31 Cal. App. 4th 545·37 Cal. Rptr. 2d 472·95 Daily Journal DAR 608·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 364
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 12, 1995D020491California5,265 words

Opinion

Opinion

Huffman, J.

Plaintiff McMillin-BCED/Miramar Ranch North (McMillin-BCED), a California general partnership, appeals the judgment of the superior court in favor of the County of San Diego (the County), defendant and respondent, in McMillin-BCED’s action for refund of property taxes. (Rev. & Tax. Code, §§51, 5097, 5149.) Pursuant to California Constitution, article XIII A, section 2 (article XIII A) and section 60 et seq., the County tax assessor reassessed land owned by the partnership on the lien date of March 1, 1991, on the basis that a 100 percent change of ownership had occurred on February 12, 1990. The assessor applied the step transaction doctrine (sometimes called the doctrine) to view several discrete business and real property transfers in 1990 as one taxable transaction accomplishing a change of ownership of the subject 1,200 acres of property.

On appeal, McMillin-BCED contends the trial court erred in applying the step transaction doctrine, because there was an inadequate showing that both of the partners in the McMillin-BCED partnership had the intention throughout the various steps involved in the transactions to reach the same end result, that a different corporation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.