Gensburg

Gensburg v. Miller

Good Law
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 1320·31 Cal. App. 4th 512·37 Cal. Rptr. 2d 97·95 Daily Journal DAR 527
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 12, 1994A063468California4,191 words

Opinion

Opinion

Smith, J.

In this federal civil rights action against employees of the state Department of Social Services (State DSS or Department), the County of San Mateo (County) and the County Department of Social Services (County DSS), arising out of the suspension of appellants’ foster home license, the trial court sustained a demurrer without leave to amend on the ground that the defendants were absolutely immune from civil liability for their alleged misconduct.

We are in agreement with the trial court and affirm.

Background

On appeal from a judgment of dismissal after sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend, we assume the truth of all well-pleaded material facts, but not contentions, deductions or conclusions of law. It is error to sustain the demurrer if plaintiff has stated a cause of action under any legal theory, and it is an abuse of discretion to sustain a demurrer without leave to amend if there is a reasonable possibility that the defect can be cured by amendment. (Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital Dist. (1992) 2 Cal.4th 962, 966-967 [ 9 Cal.Rptr.2d 92 , 831 P.2d 317 ].) Mindful of these settled rules, we summarize the allegations of the third amended complaint.

The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.