Gomez

People v. Gomez

Good Law
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 315·24 Cal. App. 4th 22·29 Cal. Rptr. 2d 94·94 Daily Journal DAR 4801·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2556
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 14, 1994D017969California3,193 words

Opinion

Opinion

Todd, J.

A jury found Michael Gomez guilty of robbery with personal use of a firearm (Pen. Code, §§ 211, 12022.5, subd. (a)) and being a felon in possession of a firearm (§ 12021, subd. (a)). In a bifurcated proceeding the trial court found true allegations that Gomez was twice previously convicted of serious felonies (§§ 667, subd. (a)/l 192.7, subd. (c)(18) and (c)(27); 667, subd. (a)/l 192.7, subd. (c)(18)) and once served a prison term (§ 667.5, subd. (b)). The court sentenced Gomez to prison for a total of twenty years consisting of an upper five-year term for the robbery, a consecutive four-year term for the personal use of a firearm, a consecutive one-year term for the prison term enhancement and 2 five-year terms for the serious prior felony convictions. Pursuant to section 654 the court stayed an upper three-year term for the felon in possession of a firearm conviction.

On appeal, Gomez contends (1) the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion to sever the felon in possession of a firearm charge from the armed robbery charge, (2) the prosecution did not meet its burden of demonstrating due diligence to secure the presence at trial of witness Fausto…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.