Smith v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Good Law
142 F. Supp. 320·1956 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3109
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 30, 195634818California1,192 words

Opinion

Opinion

Carter, J.

This dispute is between the father and a former wife of a deceased Government employee, both of whom claim the proceeds of a Federal Group Life Insurance Policy that covered the decedent. The former wife, Christina Smith, originated the action by restraining the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company from distributing the proceeds of the policy to the decedent’s father, Husted Smith; the insurance company interpleaded Husted Smith, deposited the proceeds of the policy into the Registry of the Court, and was dismissed from the litigation.

The decedent, Harold Smith, was a Post Office employee. He originally designated Christina Smith the beneficiary of his Federal Group Life Insurance, and that was the only designation of a beneficiary he ever made. Harold Smith died from cancer, and the disease had drastically affected his mind for a period of time before his death. Twenty-one days before his death, and while Harold Smith was mentally incompetent, he was placed in a retired status by the Post Office Department. Section 11 of the Group Policy in question provides in part that any designation of beneficiary shall automatically cease to be effective on the date of retirement of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.