ABS INSTITUTE v. City of Lancaster

Good Law
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 340·24 Cal. App. 4th 285·29 Cal. Rptr. 2d 224·94 Daily Journal DAR 5291·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2770
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 30, 1994B074636California4,076 words

Opinion

Opinion

Vogel, J.

ABS Institute, Colby Plastics, and Polaris Pipe Company, Inc., filed a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief challenging a City of Lancaster ordinance adopted to prohibit the use of ABS cellular pipe. Judgment was entered in favor of the City and the Institute appeals. We affirm.

Background

A.

Until the 1970’s, every city and county in California adopted its own building code, unfettered by mandated state standards or state control. (City of Bakersfield v. Miller (1966) 64 Cal.2d 93, 97 [ 48 Cal.Rptr. 889 , 410 P.2d 393 ].) In 1970, the Legislature put an end to all that by declaring a statewide interest in uniform building codes (Stats. 1970, ch. 1436, § 7, p. 2785) and otherwise expressing an intent to generally preempt the field. (Baum Electric Co. v. City of Huntington Beach (1973) 33 Cal.App.3d 573, 577 [ 109 Cal.Rptr. 260 ]; see also Danville Fire Protection Dist. v. Duffel Financial & Constr. Co. (1976) 58 Cal.App.3d 241, 248 [ 129 Cal.Rptr. 882 ].) But that is not to say that local authorities may never adopt ordinances which vary from the uniform codes. They may do so if they come within the exception of section 17958.5 of the Health and Safety Code,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.