Samuel

Samuel v. Stevedoring Services of America

Good Law
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 352·24 Cal. App. 4th 414·29 Cal. Rptr. 2d 420·94 Daily Journal DAR 5497·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2940
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 25, 1994B082368California4,121 words

Opinion

Opinion

Turner, J.

I. Introduction

Defendant, Stevedoring Services of America, purports to appeal from the denial of a motion to dismiss in the nature of a request for judgment on the pleadings. We agree with plaintiffs that the order under review is not subject to review on direct appeal prior to trial. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

II. Procedural Background

Plaintiffs, survivors of United States Navy Chief Petty Officer James Samuel, filed suit for wrongful death. Defendant filed a motion to dismiss premised on its contention it was immune from suit. Defendant argued that it was acting as the agent of the United States Army at the time of the decedent’s death. As the agent of the Army, defendant claimed it was immune from suit because decedent’s injuries occurred during the military buildup prior to the Gulf War pursuant to the provisions of the Defense Production Act (50 U.S.C. Appen., § 2157), the regulations in the Defense Priorities and Allocations System ( 15 C.F.R. § 700.90 (1993)), and Executive Order No. 12742, 56 Federal Register 1079 (Jan. 8, 1991) 1991 United States Code Congressional and Administrative News, pages B3-B5. The motion was denied on February 8, 1994. On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.