Edmunds

Edmunds v. Superior Court

Good Law
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 334·24 Cal. App. 4th 221·29 Cal. Rptr. 2d 281·94 Daily Journal DAR 5137·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2712
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 18, 1994D020481California5,669 words

Opinion

Opinion

HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.

Petitioners John S. Edmunds, attorney at law, a Hawaii law corporation; his Hawaii law partnership, Edmunds, Verga, Van Etten & O’Brien; and Edmunds as an individual (collectively, Edmunds) bring this petition for writ of mandate to require the superior court to vacate its order denying Edmunds’s motion to quash service of summons and complaint, and enter a new order granting the motion. Edmunds has been sued by Len Ronson, an individual, and his fellow limited partners (collectively, Ronson) in a now-dissolved California limited partnership known as Manchester Hawaii Properties, Ltd. (MHP), on theories of professional negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, interference with prospective economic advantage and/or contractual relations, and conspiracy, arising out of legal representation Edmunds provided to MHP in Hawaii litigation. Edmunds’s motion to quash was based on the argument that he, as a Hawaii attorney not admitted to practice in California, had represented the partnership before the state courts of Hawaii concerning rights to real estate located in the State of Hawaii, such that sufficient minimum contacts do not exist between…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.