Ovadia

Ovadia v. Abdullah

Good Law
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 444·24 Cal. App. 4th 1100·29 Cal. Rptr. 2d 527·94 Daily Journal DAR 6033·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3190
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 3, 1994B071782California4,135 words

Opinion

Opinion

Woods, J.

This appeal is from a judgment that required Anwar Abdullah and Jamil Abdullah (Anwar, Jamil or appellants) to sell their stock in West Coast Laboratories, Inc., a family-owned corporation, back to the corporation pursuant to the provisions of Corporations Code section 2000. Respondents are appellants’ brothers, Maurice Ovadia and Naim Abdullah (Maurice, Naim or respondents), who initiated proceedings under section 2000.

West Coast Laboratories, Inc., (West Coast) is a pharmaceutical manufacturing company begun in 1967 by the parties, each of whom held 25 percent of the corporation’s stock. Without here relating the various charges and countercharges that the parties have levied at each other, suffice it to say that relations between the brothers were not harmonious.

On September 12, 1991, respondents filed a petition to avoid voluntary dissolution of West Coast under section 2000. In the unverified petition, respondents alleged that “[a]t a series of meetings . . . Anwar Abdullah and Jamil Abdullah Shad stated that their shares were being voted either to sell the Corporation to a third person, and not to [respondents], or to dissolve the Corporation.” In support of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.