In Re Shaundra L.

De Witt W. Clinton, County Counsel, Joe Ben Hudgens, Deputy County Counsel, Auxiliary Legal Services and Dawyn Harrison for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

TURNER, P.J. —

Petitioners, Mindy B. and David L., parents of the minors, Brittany L. and Shaundra L., have, pursuant to rule 39.1B of the California Rules of Court, [1] filed separate petitions for writs of mandate seeking to compel the respondent court to set aside its order setting the underlying dependency proceedings for a hearing pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section [2] 366.26. We conclude: (1) the 1994 amendments to section 366.26, subdivision ( l ) require us to reach the merits of the petitions; (2) consistent with the intent of the Legislature, we have issued an order to show cause directed at the respondent court and the real party in interest, the Los Angeles Department of Children's Services, and afforded the parties the opportunity to orally argue the cause; and (3) substantial evidence supports the determination of the respondent court to set the dependency proceedings for a hearing pursuant to section 366.26. As a result, the petitions are denied.

On December 2, 1992, the second amended petition…