Robb

Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Insurance Services v. Robb

Good Law
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 363·33 Cal. App. 4th 1812·39 Cal. Rptr. 2d 887·95 Daily Journal DAR 5081·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2877
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 6, 1995B083345California5,016 words

Opinion

Opinion

Masterson, J.

In the trial court, plaintiff-employer successfully sought a preliminary injunction precluding defendant, a former employee, from using its trade secrets. However, the trial court denied the employer’s application for injunctive relief to enforce a covenant not to compete. Each party appeals. We conclude that the trial court properly declined to enforce the noncompetition covenant but erred in enjoining the former employee’s alleged misuse of trade secrets.

Background

In 1980, defendant Stanley R. Robb became employed by Infantino & Company (the Agency), an insurance brokerage firm. Together with Raymond Infantino (Infantino), Robb was an owner of the Agency. In 1984, the Agency was acquired by Fairmont Insurance Company, and in 1987, Fairmont was acquired by Transamerica.

In 1991, Robb and Infantino reacquired the Agency from Transamerica through a new corporation in which Infantino owned 65 percent of the stock, and Robb owned the remaining 35 percent. They purchased the Agency from Transamerica for $1 million by making a down payment of $50,000, assuming a promissory note for $700,000, and agreeing to purchase $250,000 of consulting services from Transamerica over a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.