In Re Marriage of Gigliotti

Good Law
33 Cal. App. 4th 518·39 Cal. Rptr. 2d 367
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 27, 1995B082860California4,357 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lillie, J.

OPINION Loren J. Prostano (Prostano) appeals from a postjudgment of dissolution of marriage order of modification of child support for the son of the parties born in September 1990. The principal issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in treating the travel expenses of the father (Gigliotti) to Massachusetts to visit with the parties' son as a deduction from the amount of child support mandated by the statutory guideline formula. *Page 521 FACTS The parties were married in 1990 and separated about 17 months later in mid-1991; they had a son, Michael, born September 22, 1990. Prostano filed a petition for dissolution of marriage in July 1991; trial was held in June 1992; Prostano requested permission of the court to move with Michael to Massachusetts, and permission was granted; Prostano and Michael moved to Massachusetts in September 1992. With respect to child custody and support, the judgment provided as follows: the parties were to have joint legal and physical custody of Michael; Prostano was to have primary physical custody and Gigliotti was to have secondary physical custody; Prostano had the right to move out of the state of California with Michael; after Prostano…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.