Whittier Redevelopment Agency v. Oceanic Arts

Good Law
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 312·33 Cal. App. 4th 1052·39 Cal. Rptr. 2d 396·95 Daily Journal DAR 4141·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2422
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 30, 1995B085788California2,896 words

Opinion

Opinion

Johnson, J.

Facts and Proceedings Below

Plaintiff Whittier Redevelopment Agency commenced eminent domain proceedings to acquire several parcels of land for redevelopment purposes, including parcels in which defendants Oceanic Arts and the Chitjians held leasehold interests. Plaintiff obtained prejudgment possession of the property after depositing the amount of probable compensation as determined by its appraiser.

Following the order awarding prejudgment possession, defendants vacated the property. The buildings they owned were demolished and removed and a shopping center constructed on the site.

Trial on the amount of compensation to be awarded defendants resulted in a judgment in excess of the amount deposited by plaintiff. Plaintiff filed a timely notice of appeal from the judgment. Thereafter, defendants filed a motion in the trial court for orders requiring plaintiff to increase its deposits of probable compensation to amounts equal to their judgments plus interest, less withdrawals previously made by defendants. Plaintiff filed a motion for permission to pay the judgment, but not the deposits, in installments. The trial court granted the defendants’ motion for an increase in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.