Tensor Group v. City of Glendale

Good Law
14 Cal. App. 4th 154·17 Cal. Rptr. 2d 639·1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 285·93 Daily Journal DAR 3999·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2064
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 4, 1993B065624California2,384 words

Opinion

Opinion

Perez, J.

Plaintiffs/appellants Tensor Group, 116 W. Maple Avenue, and 1815 Orchard Avenue (collectively as Tensor) appeal from the judgment of dismissal entered upon the sustaining of the demurrer, without leave to amend, of defendant/respondent City of Glendale (the City). Tensor’s complaint against the City had sought damages for injuries allegedly caused by the City’s alleged inverse condemnation of its properties. The City’s demurrer was sustained on the grounds that Tensor’s suit was barred by the doctrine of res judicata, and, alternatively, Tensor’s complaint had failed to state a cause of action because Tensor had not been denied substantial use of its properties.

For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the judgment.

Factual and Procedural Summary

The Prior Action.

In November 1988, Tensor filed the prior action, which combined a petition for writ of mandate and injunctive relief and a complaint for declaratory relief and damages. Therein, Tensor challenged the validity of ordinance No. 4820, enacted and made immediately effective as an emergency measure on September 27, 1988. Ordinance No. 4820 prohibited issuance of building or construction permits in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.