Avina

People v. Avina

Good Law
14 Cal. App. 4th 1303·18 Cal. Rptr. 2d 511·1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 379·93 Daily Journal DAR 4522·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2664
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 9, 1993A056572California3,384 words

Opinion

Opinion

Werdegar, J.

Hector Adolfo Avina appeals his conviction on one count of continuous sexual abuse of a child (Pen. Code, § 288.5). He contends he was deprived of his right to a unanimous jury verdict by an instruction, derived from language in the statute, allowing conviction without jury unanimity on which individual acts of abuse occurred. We find ourselves in agreement with the only previous decision on this point, People v. Higgins (1992) 9 Cal.App.4th 294 [ 11 Cal.Rptr.2d 694 ], that section 288.5 does not unconstitutionally deprive a defendant of a unanimous jury verdict. We affirm.

Facts

Defendant was charged with a single count of continuous abuse occurring during 1990. The victim, Yesenia A., turned 10 years old in July 1990. She lived with her mother, father and three siblings in a mobile home. From April 1989 until October 1, 1990, defendant lived with the family, first sleeping in the mobile home, then later in a cabin on the property.

On the night of September 30, 1990, Yesenia’s mother was in bed when she heard the sound of a door and got up to investigate. She saw defendant walking around the corner outside. Yesenia, who had been asleep earlier, was now awake. When…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.