Cassinos

Cassinos v. Union Oil Co.

Good Law
14 Cal. App. 4th 1770·18 Cal. Rptr. 2d 574·1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 417·93 Daily Journal DAR 4964·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2907
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 20, 1993B065018California6,911 words

Opinion

Opinion

Stone, J.

Union Oil Company of California et al. (Union) appeals from the $5,298,198 judgment of the trial court for injecting offsite wastewater into the mineral estate owned by respondents, Gus Cassinos et al. We affirm, except for part of the prejudgment interest awarded by the trial court.

Before 1917, Escolle owned the subject property in fee simple absolute. In 1917, Escolle deeded the surface estate to E. Righetti. Escolle very broadly and specifically reserved to itself the mineral estate.

In 1946, Escolle entered into an oil and gas lease with Union. In 1980, successor Escolle TIC entered into a revised oil and gas lease with Union which was amended on January 1, 1983. Pursuant to these leases, Union drilled various oil and gas wells on the subject mineral estate, including one known as A-16 which produced small quantities of oil and gas.

During the early 1980’s, Union developed an excess wastewater problem on adjacent property it owns. This wastewater hindered production of Union’s oil and gas on that property. Union determined that its best solution to this problem would be to inject the water into A-16 on the Escolle lease.

Union obtained permission to do so from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.