Cooley

People v. Cooley

Good Law
14 Cal. App. 4th 1394·18 Cal. Rptr. 2d 346·1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 382·93 Daily Journal DAR 4592·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2677
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 12, 1993E010340California1,968 words

Opinion

Opinion

Timlin, J.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered below upon his conviction by jury of one count of forcible rape (Pen. Code, § 261, subd. (a)(2)) and one count of sexual battery (Pen. Code, § 243.4, subd. (a)). On appeal, defendant has raised the following contentions: (1) There is insufficient evidence of “wrongful touching” to support the conviction of felony sexual battery in violation of section 243.4, subdivision (a); (2) the triil court committed reversible error in instructing the jury with CALJIC No. 2.21.2; (3) the trial court committed reversible error by failing to provide the jury with a written copy of the jury instructions pursuant to section 1093; and (4) the trial court abused its discretion in denying defendant’s motion for a new trial based on the ground that purportedly prejudicial testimony was given during the trial by a prosecution witness. We shall conclude that the evidence is such that defendant’s conviction of felony sexual battery must be modified to a conviction of misdemeanor sexual battery (§ 243.4, subd. (d)), but that no other errors requiring redress were committed in the proceedings below. Consequently, we shall modify the judgment as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.