Settimo Associates v. Environ Systems, Inc.

Good Law
14 Cal. App. 4th 842·17 Cal. Rptr. 2d 757·1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 332·93 Daily Journal DAR 4009·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2379
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 26, 1993D015713California1,009 words

Opinion

Opinion

Work, J.

Settimo Associates (Settimo) appeals a judgment on the pleadings in favor of Environ Systems, Inc., Otto F. Newton, Site Preparation, Inc., and Developers Insurance Co. (collectively Environ) on Settimo’s complaint for intentional or negligent interference with prospective economic advantage. Settimo contends the court erred in determining that Environ’s bidding on private contracts for work outside the scope of its specialty license did not give rise to a tort claim in favor of competing bidders who were properly licensed. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment.

Factual and Procedural Background

Settimo, holder of a general B-l contractor’s license, sued Environ, alleging alternative causes of action for intentional or negligent interference with prospective economic advantage. Settimo complained that it had twice submitted the lowest bid by any duly licensed contractor for installing a computer support facility only to lose each contract to Environ which held only a specialty contractor’s license which was not sufficient for some of the work involved, but which submitted lower bids. Settimo asserts Environ’s lack of a general contracting license alone…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.