Weinzettl
Rush v. Weinzettl
Opinion
Opinion
Gilbert, J.
An attorney who is not of record files a motion on behalf of a party in an action. Does the trial court have jurisdiction to impose sanctions against such an attorney? Yes, because he represents a party even though he is not attorney of record.
Attorney Henry W. Bockman appeals an order imposing $500 sanctions against trim under Code of Civil Procedure section 128.5. Here, the trial court had jurisdiction to impose sanctions, but we do not decide the merits of the appeal. Instead, we dismiss the appeal because section 904.1, subdivision (k) does not permit interim appellate review of monetary sanctions less than $750 imposed against a party or his attorney.
Facts
Plaintiff Brian Rush suffered personal injuries in an automobile collision in Thousand Oaks on February 1, 1990. On October 12, 1990, his mother, as guardian ad litem, brought an action for negligence against defendant Dieter Weinzettl. Attorney George N. Nicoletti represented the Rushes.
Nearly eight months later, the Rushes dismissed Nicoletti as their attorney. Mrs. Rush signed a substitution of attorney form and became a plaintiff in propria persona.