Wellman

John I. Haas, Inc. v. Wellman

Good Law
186 F.2d 862·1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2183
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 31, 195112442California3,705 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bone, J.

This is the third of a series of three cases that were tried jointly in the court below without a jury and are before us on appeal. The other two cases are Hugo V. Loewi, Inc., v. Geschwill, 9 Cir., 186 F.2d 849 and Hugo V. Loewi Inc., v. Smith, 9 Cir., 186 F.2d 858 . The parties involved in this action are John I. Haas, Inc., defendant-appellant, who was the hop buyer and O. L. Wellman, plaintiff-appellee who was the hop grower.

The contract in the instant case was negotiated in 1944 for hops to be grown and delivered in the year 1947. If covered, and was a commitment for, one-half of the salable crop of appellee’s cluster and fuggle hops, the other half having been sold to another buyer. As in the other two cases the dispute relates only to the cluster hops and not to the fuggles. The contract between the parties is in many respects similar to that in the other two cases. The differences which are material to the issues before us will be noted in the course of our opinion.

Appellee’s hop yard, like most of the hop yards in the Willamette Valley, Oregon, suffered an attack of mildew some time during the growing season of 1947. Noakes, manager of A. J. Ray & Son (appellant’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.