Dilger

Dilger v. Moyles

Good Law
1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 380·54 Cal. App. 4th 1452·63 Cal. Rptr. 2d 591·97 Daily Journal DAR 6244·97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3677
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 15, 1997A074839California1,554 words

Opinion

Opinion

Anderson, J.

Dorothy Dilger (appellant) was struck on the golf course by a ball hit by another golfer, David Moyles (respondent), whom she sued. She appeals the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in his favor. We hold that the trial court was correct in finding that primary assumption of risk bars her lawsuit; accordingly, we affirm.

I. Facts

On the morning of April 26, 1994, appellant and two companions were golfing at Sky West Golf Course in Hayward. After teeing off on the fifth tee, appellant, who was 78 years old at the time, drove her golf cart to where her ball had landed—approximately 95 yards down the fairway. She stopped her cart on the left side of the fairway, which borders the fairway of the sixth hole. After stopping her cart, appellant was struck in the mouth by a ball hit by respondent from the sixth fairway. At the time he hit the ball, respondent was standing behind a row of trees which separated the fifth and sixth fairways. Respondent claimed these trees blocked the line of sight to where appellant was located. Whether or not respondent yelled “fore” upon hitting his errant shot was disputed.

II. Analysis

Summary judgment may properly be granted if a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.