Weems

People v. Weems

Good Law
1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 335·54 Cal. App. 4th 854·62 Cal. Rptr. 2d 903·97 Daily Journal DAR 5455·97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3174
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 29, 1997H014769California3,341 words

Opinion

Opinion

Cottle, J.

A jury found defendant Michael Oneal Weems guilty of two felonies, causing injury to another while driving under the influence of alcohol (Veh. Code, § 23153, subd. (a)) and causing injury to another while having 0.08 percent or more, by weight, of alcohol in his blood (Veh. Code, § 23153, subd. (b)). Defendánt was placed on probation for five years upon condition, inter alia, that he serve four months in county jail and pay $10,767.39 in restitution. On appeal defendant does not dispute he was driving under the influence of alcohol or that he was driving while having 0.08 percent or more, by weight, of alcohol in his blood. However, he contends his convictions must be reversed because the jury erroneously was instructed it could consider evidence of defendant’s violation of the mandatory seat belt law (§ 27315) in determining whether, while driving under the influence or with the prohibited blood-alcohol percentage, he concurrently did an unlawful act or neglected a legal duty which proximately caused injury to another. For the reasons stated below, we conclude a driver’s violation of our state mandatory seat belt law does constitute a concurrent “act forbidden by law,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.