Mabry

Mabry v. Superior Court

Good Law
110 Cal. Rptr. 3d 201·185 Cal. App. 4th 208·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 794
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 2, 2010G042911California10,487 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sills, J.

I. SUMMARY

Civil Code section 2923.5 requires, before a notice of default may be filed, that a lender contact the borrower in person or by phone to “assess” the borrower’s financial situation and “explore” options to prevent foreclosure. Here is the exact, operative language from the statute; “(2) A mortgagee, beneficiary, or authorized agent shall contact the borrower in person or by telephone in order to assess the borrower’s financial situation and explore options for the borrower to avoid foreclosure.” There is nothing in section 2923.5 that requires the lender to rewrite or modify the loan.

In this writ proceeding, we answer these questions about section 2923.5, also known as the Perata Mortgage Relief Act :

II. BACKGROUND

In December 2006, Terry and Michael Mabry refinanced the loan on their home in Corona from Paul Financial, borrowing about $700,000. In April 2008, Paul Financial assigned to Aurora Loan Services the right to service the loan. In this opinion, we will treat Aurora as synonymous with the lender and use the terms interchangeably.

According to the lender, in mid-July 2008—before the Mabrys missed their August 2008 loan payment—the couple called…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.