Riley

People v. Riley

Good Law
110 Cal. Rptr. 3d 585·185 Cal. App. 4th 754·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 877
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 14, 2010D054660California5,019 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aaron, J.

I.

INTRODUCTION

Defendant Sharon Sue Riley appeals from a judgment of conviction after a jury convicted her of possessing marijuana in a prison facility, in violation of Penal Code section 4573.6. Riley was teaching at Calipatria State Prison when correctional officers at the prison searched her belongings and found a small coin purse that contained approximately 0.47 grams of marijuana.

On appeal, Riley contends that the trial court erred in denying her motion for judgment of acquittal and in permitting the prosecution to reopen its case to present evidence that the amount of marijuana found in the coin purse is a “usable amount.” In a related argument, Riley claims that the trial court abused its discretion in allowing the prosecution to recall one of its witnesses to testify that 0.47 grams of marijuana is a usable amount. Finally, Riley contends that the trial court erred in instructing the jury with a revised version of CALCRIM No. 220, which she maintains fails to instruct the jury that the prosecution must prove each element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt.

We conclude that Riley’s claims are without merit, and affirm the judgment of the trial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.