Samantha C. v. State Department of Developmental Services

Good Law
112 Cal. Rptr. 3d 415·185 Cal. App. 4th 1462·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 969
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 25, 2010B211710California11,469 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mallano, J.

Samantha C. appeals from a judgment denying her petition for a writ of mandate and her request for declaratory relief. She seeks to overturn determinations by defendants Harbor Regional Center (HRC) and the State Department of Developmental Services (DDS) that she did not have a developmental disability and was therefore not entitled to services under the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act (Lanterman Act). (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 4500 et seq.) Section 4512(a) includes within the definition of developmental disability: mental retardation, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, autism, and disabling conditions closely related to, or requiring similar treatment to, mental retardation. Samantha also seeks to reverse the trial court’s determination upholding the validity of provisions of section 54000, subdivision (c) of title 17 of the California Code of Regulations (regulation 54000(c)).

We affirm that part of the judgment upholding the validity of the regulations because they are consistent with section 4512(a). But we reverse the trial court’s determination that Samantha does not have a developmental disability under the Lanterman Act because Samantha has a disabling…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.