Motown Record Corp. v. George A. Hormel & Co.

Good Law
657 F. Supp. 1236·3 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1124·56 U.S.L.W. 2011·1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4787
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 16, 1987CV 85-6973 WJRCalifornia2,505 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rea, J.

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

I. INTRODUCTION

This Matter is before the Court based on defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Proc. 12(c). Defendants move for judgment on the pendent state claims alleged in the third, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth and tenth causes of action claiming that these causes of action are preempted by the Federal Copyright Act. Defendants also move for judgment on the Lanham Act claim on the grounds that plaintiffs cannot seek trademark protection of an “image.”

II. BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs Motown Record Corporation (Motown) and Jobete Music Company, Inc. (Jobete) brought this action against defendant George A. Hormel & Co. and Ruhr/Paragon, Inc. alleging copyright infringement, trademark infringement, seven pendent state claims and a claim for declaratory relief.

In 1964, the songwriting team of Brian Holland, Lamont Dozier, and Eddie Holland (Holland-Dozier-Holland) composed a musical composition entitled “Baby Love”. Holland-Dozier-Holland entered into exclusive songwriting agreements with plaintiff Jobete, pursuant to which Jobete was granted the copyright in the musical composition “Baby Love.” “Baby Love” was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.