Steinman

Steinman v. MALAMED

Good Law
111 Cal. Rptr. 3d 304·185 Cal. App. 4th 1550·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 982
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 28, 2010B216291, B218554California4,971 words

Opinion

Opinion

Johnson, J.

Mark Steinman and the Steinman Family Trust (collectively, Steinman) settled their action against Kenneth D. Malamed and Financial Management Advisors, Inc., and Financial Management Advisors, LLC (collectively, FMA). The trial court dismissed the action pursuant to a stipulation by the parties, and retained jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement. After FMA paid Steinman the amount due under the settlement early in order to take advantage of a prepayment discount, FMA filed a motion to enforce the prepayment provision: FMA argued that it had overpaid, and sought to recover the overpayment amount. The trial court granted the motion and filed an order requiring Steinman to return the overpayment; later, the court awarded FMA attorney’s fees and prejudgment interest. Steinman appeals the order requiring him to return the overpayment and the order awarding attorney’s fees and prejudgment interest. We reverse the judgment and vacate the order awarding attorney’s fees.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In 2004, Steinman sued FMA for breach of fiduciary duty and fraud, in connection with FMA’s advice and investment services regarding a securities investment made by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.